You can interpret this title in two different ways: either
as a winner or a loser. One can interpret this as making history in a positive
sense where one’s actions change history for good. However, I wish to use this
term to represent the underrepresented side. I use this phrase in negative
connotation in way to establish that for many societies listed in the book,
they lost in the fight against the dominant power. This win-lose binary is prevalent
in the third section of stories compiled by Linqvist. I chose to analyze the
portion of the book under “History of the Future” because it references
different books with a common theme. Every history is told from the winner’s
side and each novel represents different societies being alienated and
exterminated. Each section elevates an “us versus them” mentality where the
winner is justified to annihilate their opponent (whether they are
Chinese, Japanese, or African) because they do not see them as equals. This type of dehumanization is critical because it creates a culture where killing is a crime but not through the bases of one’s race
and where they reside. It also goes back to the critical definition of racism
stated by Ruth Wilson Gilmore:
“Racism,
specifically, is the state sanctioned or extralegal production and exploitation
of group-differentiated
vulnerability to premature death”.
“Premature death” applies to non-Whites or non-English
speaking individuals and it propagated through institutionalized actions such
as murder proposed by the state. It puts into the question whether the demotion
of “savage” really belongs to the groups being purged and whether the “United
Man” should be categorized in that context.
It is also important to point out was how Lindqvist used an
oxymoron to display the complexity of this section. What exactly entails as the
history portion of the future? The
use of time distortion is important because it is what we use to experience
these future events. The second section (In The Beginning There Was the Bomb)
gives a concrete explanation of the history of the bomb yet Lindqvist chose to
approach the next chapter with references that are fictional novels. These
novels resonate because while fictional, they are influential to extremists
(see Turner Diaries and 1995 Oklahoma City Bombing).
| The Alfred P. Murrah Federal Building two days after the bombing (Taken from Wikipedia) |
I would like to conclude that this section exemplifies that you
are pretty screwed if you aren’t part of the majority and will be forever
enslaved under this culture of a White-dominant society. If you fit into the
category that is not the “White Man” or identify as the “United”, you probably
already have been “disintegrated” (Section 57). This “purge” or “Great
Extermination” (Section 56) depicts a dystopian world for people of color and unfortunately
for these individuals…the “History of the Future” really means that their
“Future is history”.
No comments:
Post a Comment